WELCOME

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversation Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! I encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!


--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Conversant Notes: "Is Google making us stupid?"

Nicholas Carr’s article embraces the idea of skeptisism in our infinite information age involving the vast use of the internet and how modern technology effects our process of learning information. He mentions that the system of the internet’s information highway was designed to create “perfect efficiency” of information and communication. In his introduction Carr suggests that the internet age has created a change in thinking, especially in reading. He shares his own experience relating an increase of internet use and other technology to the decrease in the ability to “deep read”, to concentrate and internally comprehend reading materials. He also describes coming to this realization with a sense that there is “someone or something tinkering with my brain” and goes on to point out for many “the Net is becoming a universal medium” in encompassing the debatable question, “Is Google making us stupid?”

Many of us could agree that we are in the midst of many changes in the way we read and think about today’s media. Some of us can identify with how the internet produces a style of skimming text versus deeply understanding the content in which we are reading. In exploring both sides to this debate, Carr explains the advantages of having information at our fingertips as “the perfect recall of silicon memory” and how it can be a boost to thinking, but it comes with a price. “And what the Net seems to be doing is chipping away my capacity for concentration and contemplation”, Carr states . It is interesting how he compares his mind to being” a scuba diver in the sea of words” in deep reading and thinking as apposed to “jet skiing” on the surface.

In our society today we are valued for how we interpret the content of what we read and how quickly we are able to process that information to create productivity. Despite my own concerns of this being an era of too much information, I too find internet research to be both helpful and a hinderance in communication. Being aware of the changes in how we read and interpret information will help us to make necessary moves to counter-act the unsavory effects of reading on the internet. Ultimately it seems it is up to us as readers to expose ourselves to various forms of text including written print and to recognize when we are merely “jet skiing” the surface of information.

3 comments:

  1. The scuba diver metaphor really helped me understand the article better and I love how it was brought back in this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The writer here seems to have a great flow, delivering many great bites of what “they say” giving their own rendition of the points Carr was trying to make while at the same time grabbing my attention by staying on subject through the entire explanation of the articles message. Then after this blogger has me feeling both sides of the argument as depicted in Carr article they deliver their personal perspective, which puts the responsibility of keeping all of your little neurons in your brain working back into the lap of the individual. It contrasts with my opinion, as psychological Nero science points out if ya don’t use it ya lose it and today we know that that statement means on the biological level.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well balanced, nice use of quotes.

    ReplyDelete