WELCOME

Welcome to our Eng 100 Blog “Conversation Beyond the Classroom”! The title of this blog refers to the community of active readers & collaborative learners we are creating by sharing our academic writing for Eng 100 with each other + a larger group of students, instructors, academics, and just about anybody who chooses to follow our blog! When you write and post your reader responses here (and, later, as you write your essays for the course), I encourage you to use this audience to conceptualize who you are writing for and, most important, how to communicate your ideas so that this group of academic readers and writers can easily follow your line of thinking. Think about it this way: What do you need to explain and articulate in order for the other bloggers to understand your response to the essays we’ve read in class? What does your audience need to know about those essays and the authors who wrote them? And how can you show your readers, in writing, which ideas you add to these “conversations” that take place in the texts we study?
As students of Eng 100, you will use this blog to begin conversations with other academic writers on campus (students and instructors alike). We become active readers of each other’s writing when we comment on posts here. And, best of all, we are using this space to share ideas! I encourage you to use this blog to further think through the topics and writing strategies you will be introduced to this quarter. As always, be sure to give credit to those people whose ideas you borrow for your own thinking and writing (you should do this in the blog by commenting on their post, but you will also be required to cite what you borrow from your peers/instructors if and when it winds up in your essays. More details on that later…).
Finally, keep in mind that writing to and for this audience is a good way to prepare for the panel of readers (faculty at WCC) who will be reading and assessing your writing portfolio at the end of the quarter. We hope that as a large group of active readers, we can better prepare each other for this experience. But, in the meantime, let’s have fun with it! I am really excited see how far we can take this together!


--Mary Hammerbeck, Instructor of Eng 100

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Quotation Sandwiches

a.

  • "Nielsen focuses on how to hold people's attention to convey information. He's not overly concerned with pleasure reading" (Agger 3)

  • "We have to teach our minds how to translate the symbolic characters we see into the language we understand." (Carr 3)

b.

  • Agger states that, "Nielsen focuses on how to hold people's attention to convey information. He's not overly concerned with pleasure reading" (Agger 3). Agger's point is that when writing online, as a writer you have to write in a way to keep the readers attention and not in the way a writer would want too.

I chose this because when writing in my essay about Lazy Eyes I talked about the meaning of the article which was how to read online. In the article he talked about how he had to write as a writer himself online and the main focus was to keep the reader interested.

  • Carr himself writes, "We have to teach our minds how to translate the symbolic characters we see into the language we understand." (Carr 3). Carr’s point is that the Internet is making us so we don’t have to think and in the long haul, making us stupid. So the only knowledge our minds get is when we have to find a deeper meaning of the language we use and how we understand it.

I chose this because in my essay I use the article Is Google Making Us Stupid and talk about how Carr defines the Internet and the information/knowledge people are gaining and how it is nothing near the amount we need to keep our minds growing.

No comments:

Post a Comment