I'm just going to try writing this like "Lazy Eyes: How We Read Online" by Michael Agger.
When people talk about how computers is evolving more and more, we find ourselves turning away from our ability to read long passages.
In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr, they say that we are not just walking away from literature but rather a full sprint away from it. However, I say that since we are not taking our time having to read a 10 page paper to get the main point, rather than nowadays we just read a couple paragraphs and we get the main point in a matter of minutes.
THEY SAY:
- Can't consume the depth of the knowledge that was once needed
- TV, Radio, and computers are consuming us all
- Skim long passages and skip boring details.
- We have shorten our attention span
- Starting to live and depend on technology
We are starting to have the ability to learn more and more knowledge. Everyone doesn’t truly want the whole details; they just want to know what happened, what caused it etc. And then they are satisfied. We aren’t shorting our knowledge but we are actually gaining knowledge, with the consequence of only to lose the boring details out of it. Even news anchors only spend, what, 30 seconds to maybe a minute tops, on a story that’s interesting.
I SAY:
- Its helping us gain more knowledge
- Just making life a little bit easier
- Expanding the human knowledge, in our heads and around us
- Brain is malleable, its always changing and learning new things
There is so much going on out there that we need to shorten stories and news articles. I feel at some point that everyone can know everything that is happening in the world right now, if every single story just had a few main details about it. Shortening the depth of knowledge will give us the opportunity to expand our length of knowledge that we can take in.
I really like the way you demonstrated "I say, They say" in Carr's article. I found it to be very helpful in understanding this writing concept. Thank you!
ReplyDelete