Scholes uses a Budweiser commercial as an example and deconstructs the commercial into categories that fall into racism, politic, and country pride. Video text play off of peoples emotions and cultural information, such as racism, politics and country pride, to construct a story and to get pleasure from that story. Scholes states that:
In processing a narrative text we actually construct the story, bringing a vast repertory of cultural knowledge to bear upon the text that we are contemplating. Our pleasure in the narrative is to some extent a constructive pleasure, based upon the sense of accomplishment we achieve by successfully completing this task. By "getting" the story, we prove our competence and demonstrate our membership in a cultural community” (par 4).In a since, some video texts contains no story or meanings, just random scenes that lack context; the viewer, without realizing it, takes the random scenes and applies their own personal and cultural beliefs, to add context and meaning to the video text, to create a story. By connecting the dots, and creates a story with cultural meaning, the viewer then gets a sense of pride in their competence.
Scholes disputes critics who think Americans lack any culture. Scholes claims that, “many Americans are not without culture; they simply have a different culture… What they really lack, for the most part, is any way of analyzing and criticizing the power of a text” (par 8). What Scholes would like to see from more Americans, even taught in our schools, is critical analysis, which he believes is “necessary to have the tools for ideological criticism… [i]n this age of massive manipulation and disinformation, criticism is the only way we have of taking something seriously” (par 8-9). Scholes believes that greatest patriots will be the ones that question “our ideology critically, with particular attention to the gaps between mythology and practice. Above all, we must start with our most beloved icons, not the ones we profess allegiance to, but those that really have the power to move and shake us” (par9). Scholes wants people to question everything, that manipulation and disinformation lies behind every corner, but for some reason Scholes believes that Government should be excluded. I believe that even our icons that we “profess allegiance to”, Governments, should not be excluded from Scholes list of Icons to criticize. That if we are to criticize our culture, along with our belief systems and society, considering they are icons “that really have the power to move and shake us”, then Governments should be included into the list to question.
No comments:
Post a Comment